Proposed Cuts to EPA and National Park Service Threaten Environmental Progress
- B.O.S.S. Policy Team
- Jul 16
- 1 min read
House Republicans have introduced a proposal that would significantly reduce funding for both the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Park Service. These budget cuts are more than just a political statement—they endanger the foundation of our environmental protections and the well-being of communities across the country
The EPA plays a crucial role in regulating pollution, protecting public health, and enforcing climate policy. Meanwhile, the National Park Service is responsible for preserving the natural beauty and cultural history of our nation for future generations. Cutting resources from these agencies undermines their ability to carry out this vital work.
What’s at Stake:
Climate Action: Reduced funding for the EPA weakens the enforcement of emissions standards and slows our progress towards national climate goals.
Environmental Justice: Communities of color and low-income neighborhoods—already disproportionately impacted by pollution—would be hit hardest by these cuts.
Public Lands: National parks and protected areas face greater risks of degradation, underfunded maintenance, and diminished access.
Public Health: Cuts to air and water quality monitoring put families at risk, especially those living near industrial areas and fossil fuel sites.
At B.O.S.S., we believe that clean air, safe water, and preserved public lands are not optional they are essential. Proposed cuts to key environmental agencies highlight the continued need for strong, equitable protections that prioritize both people and the planet. These developments underscore the importance of monitoring how policy decisions impact frontline communities and the broader clean energy transition.
